Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 109(2): 319-321, 2023 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460089

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study estimated a one-time point seroprevalence rate of Chagas disease among people of Latin American descent in Suffolk County, Long Island, New York. Subjects who met the inclusion criteria were screened using the Chagas Detect Plus Rapid Test (InBios, Seattle, WA) with confirmation via Trypanosoma cruzi enzyme immunoassay and T. cruzi immunoblot assay. Administration of a questionnaire regarding demographics and risk factors followed. A seroprevalence rate of 10.74% was found. Identified risk factors included prior residence in a palm leaf house (odds ratio [OR], 10.42; P = 0.003; 95% CI, 2.18-49.76), residence in a house with triatomines (OR, 9.03; P = 0.006; 95% CI, 1.90-42.88), and history of triatomine bite (OR, 9.52; P = 0.009; 95% CI, 1.75-51.77). Our findings emphasize the importance of this frequently underdiagnosed disease and help highlight the importance of early screening among high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Chagas Disease , Trypanosoma cruzi , Humans , Latin America , New York/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Chagas Disease/epidemiology , Chagas Disease/diagnosis
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(4): 697-701, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26809931

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends one-time screening of the 1945-1965 birth cohort (baby boomers) for hepatitis C (HCV) infection. New York State legislation mandates screening of baby boomers for HCV in most patient care settings except the emergency department (ED). This cross-sectional study explores baby boomer knowledge of HCV, prevalence of HCV infection, and linkage to care from a large urban ED. METHOD: Patients participated in a researcher-administered structured interview and were offered an HCV screening test. If HCV antibody reactive, a follow-up clinic appointment was made within 6 weeks. Reminder telephone calls were made a week before the appointment. Attendance at the follow-up appointment was considered successful linkage to care. RESULTS: A total of 915 eligible patients were approached between October 21, 2014, and July 13, 2015. A total of 427 patients participated in the structured interview; 383 agreed to an HCV rapid test. Prevalence of HCV antibody reactivity was 7.3%. Four patients were successfully linked to care. General knowledge about HCV was fair. Misconceptions about transmission were apparent. Beliefs that "if someone is infected with HCV they will most likely carry the virus all their lives unless treated" and that "someone with hepatitis can look and feel fine" were significantly associated with agreement to testing. CONCLUSIONS: Better linkage to care is needed to justify HCV screening in the 1945-1965 birth cohort in this particular ED setting. Linkage to care from the ED is challenging but can potentially be improved with specific measures including simplified screening algorithms and supportive resources.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepacivirus/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Prevalence , Referral and Consultation , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...